Suncoasters of St Petersburg

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
590830257
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
St Petersburg, FL, USA
Phone
7278219888
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Commemorative Events

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$11,940
Expenses
$6,984
Assets
$35,860

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KIMBERLY GUSTAFSON (PRESIDENT)
  • GENE COLLINS (PRESIDENT EL)

People named in this filing

  • KIMBERLY GUSTAFSON (PRESIDENT)
  • GENE COLLINS (PRESIDENT EL)
  • PAULA POPOVICH (SR VICE PRES)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The suncoasters of st. Petersburg are a civic organization comprised of nearly 200 business leaders who donate their time and resources to produce events that celebrate the city of st. Petersburg to be enjoyed by the total community.

What it reported doing in 2013

Suncoasters supports and contributes revenues raised from fund raising activities, when available, to suncoasters of st petersburg foundation, a 501(c)(3) organization

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 74
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 58.5%; rating input score 58
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 41.5%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.13; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6.3% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 58.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2009 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.