Suncoast Community Health Centers, Inc.

Legal name: Suncoast Community Health Centers Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
591741303
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Brandon, FL, US
Phone
813-653-6100
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$61,595,016
Expenses
$62,662,403
Assets
$78,934,970
Liabilities
$17,371,045

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

24 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRADLEY HERREMANS (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • BRADLEY HERREMANS (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $415,808 total reported compensation
  • BRIAN SHAUB DO (CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER): $344,773 total reported compensation
  • EVA DUPAY (DENTAL DIRECTOR ASSOC.): $313,991 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide high-quality, comprehensive, and accessible healthcare services to all individuals in our community, regardless of their ability to pay.

What it reported doing in 2025

Clinic administration: medical, dental and mental health providers and support staff are directly supported by clinic staff and administration. Their goals are to provide safe, friendly and knowledgeable services to the patient as well as the provider and support staff.our comprehensive approach ensures that the whole family receives outstanding clinic administration, many times by a team of two or more personnel.administrative services: medical, dental and mental health providers, support services, and clinic administration are supported by and receive direction from administrative staff. This administrative staff is made up of executive office, human resources, management information systems, public relations, finance, patient billing, logistics, quality improvement, and risk management departments. Our comprehensive approach ensures that the whole organization provides the best customer service to the patient care team which will then be the best customer service to the patient.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 85% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.8%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 81.1%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.7%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.26; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.2%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 10 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 8 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 80.8% of revenue deployed · 81.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $50.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $416K · 24 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.5M reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.