Sun City K-9 Adoptions Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
320122949
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Sun City, CA, USA
Phone
9516793597
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Adoption

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,369
Expenses
$8,880
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GAIL HANDELMAN (President & CEO)
  • JULIE ATALLAH (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • GAIL HANDELMAN (President & CEO)
  • JULIE ATALLAH (Vice President)
  • LORETTA DUDZIAK (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide information to the general public concerning the necessity and advisability of spay and neutering dogs and cats. To offer financial support to nonprofit, no-kill animal shelters and rescues, other nonprofit organizations for the benefit of stray and abandoned dogs and cats, and to assist those who foster for nonprofit, no-kill shelters and rescues. To also assist seniors and military veterans for the purpose of aiding them to cover the costs to spay, neuter and vaccinate their dogs and cats.

What it reported doing in 2017

To provide information to the general public concerning the necessity and advisability of spay and neutering dogs and cats. To offer financial support to nonprofit, no-kill shelters and rescues, other nonprofit organizations for the benefit of stray and abandoned dogs and cats, and to assist those who foster for nonprofit, no-kill shelters and rescues. Also to offer assistance to senior citizens and military veterans for the purpose of aiding them to cover veterinary costs to spay, neuter and vaccinate their dogs and cats.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 11
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -65.4%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -40.1% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -43% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -32.8% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2011 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.