Summit County Library Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
841149701
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Frisco, CO, USA
Phone
9706684138
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Libraries

Reported finances

Revenue
$43,119
Expenses
$41,144
Assets
$151,857

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • DANA CHRISTIANSEN (CHAIR)
  • JOYCE DIERAUER (TREASURER)
  • BARB PARRY (VICE-CHAIR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To serve as an advocate for the summit county library system and to provide financial support beyond the library's normal operating expenditures, when unanticipated needs arise, and for capital projects.

What it reported doing in 2024

During 2024/2025 summit county library foundation provided a 20,000 grant to the summit county libraries toward their digital resource platform hoopla. This platform provides free access to films, audiobooks, research tools, and educational content for all. Through our one community, one card partnership with the summit school district, every student has access to these tools with their school id, ensuring that all childrenregardless of backgroundcan learn and grow beyond the classroom.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 98% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.1%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 90.6%; rating input score 91

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.6%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.69; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 21.9% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -5.1% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87.1% of revenue deployed · 90.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $37K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.