Summit County Adm Support Committee Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 205752107
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Akron, OH, USA
- Phone
- 3307623500
- Rating
- 93
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Citizen Participation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $28,261
- Expenses
- $296,894
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Michael Bullock (President)
- Aaron Kurchev (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Michael Bullock (President)
- Jennifer Peveich (Treasurer)
- Russell Balthis (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promotion of the funding of social welfare programs in Summit County, Ohio pertaining to alcohol, drug addictions and mental health services.
What it reported doing in 2023
Our annual Recovery Challenge 5K run and 1 mile walk event held on Saturday, May 22, 2023, attracted over 400 participants including behavioral health service provider agencies across Summit County. We promoted the link between physical well-being from running and walking during the event to personal mental wellness. Information tables were set up at the event and staff were available to discuss the value of their services in combating substance use disorders and mental illness in Summit County.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 97% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -950.5%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $297K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2011 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.