The Arc Greater Hudson Valley

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
146028767
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Monticello, NY, US
Phone
(845) 796-1350
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$86,383,439
Expenses
$82,672,809
Assets
$50,036,398
Liabilities
$23,519,874

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

27 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SHARON RUSSITANO (PRESIDENT)
  • KATHLEEN DONAHUE (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • AMANDA FRIEDEMANN (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
  • REGINA MCKENNY-SNEAD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • REGINA MCKENNY-SNEAD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $373,713 total reported compensation
  • MUHAMMAD MALIK (MEDICAL DIRECTOR): $276,495 total reported compensation
  • JAMES KRUEGER (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $274,830 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is supporting people with unique abilities to live as valued and contributing members of the community.

What it reported doing in 2024

Day services provided supports to 534 people across a variety of site based and community settings. Programs supported individuals to develop meaningful relationships in their communities, pursue their interests and develop skills to increase independence and explore new opportunities. Notable accomplishments include the launch of arc in the park, a volunteer program in conjunction with local governments to adopt public parks and provide cleanup services. Self-advocacy programs continued to provide people supported with opportunities to support each other's ability to advocate for issues of importance to them, and connect with other self-advocates across the state and beyond. Self-advocates attended rallies in albany to advocate for legislative action on topics important to them. (continued on schedule o)day services continued to develop opportunities to deepen community connections, by supporting the establishment of a local kiwanis aktion club in orange county, creating connections with other kiwanis groups and broadening the opportunities available to program participants.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 97% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.4%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 90.1%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: $0.83 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.3%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.61; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.47; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.1%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 9 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 4 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 86.4% of revenue deployed · 90.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $74.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $374K · 27 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $4.2M reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 8 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 53/100.