Suffrage Coalition Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
832878770
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Knoxville, TN, USA
Phone
0000000000
Rating
51
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Nonmonetary Support N.E.C.*

Reported finances

Revenue
$107,639
Expenses
$10,097
Assets
$342,824
Liabilities
$182

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WANDA SOBIESKI (PRESIDENT)
  • LINDA HANEY (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • WANDA SOBIESKI (PRESIDENT)
  • LINDA HANEY (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • HOLLY MATTHEWS (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To locate and preserve the history of woman suffrage especially in Tennessee ny placing memorials in highly visible public places assisting in the writing of books and articles by using art and music memorabilia and artifacts to spark interest and preserve the history as it is uncovered and to establish a permanent museum to ensure the history is not lost again

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization has continued to work on infrastructure including improving the website increasing social media presence establishing standing committees outreach with education programs to new groups pop-up artifact showings fundraising assisting with the development of videos plays and musicals to tell the story and to continue researching forgotten women who devoted time and talents to the cause of woman suffrage in Tennessee the search for a location for a museum has begun in earnest

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 7
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 89
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 2.6%; rating input score 3
  • Program expense ratio: 14.3%; rating input score 14

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 90.6%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 33.95; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -35.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 35% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 2.6% of revenue deployed · 14.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.