Suffolk County Association of Municipal Employees Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 112730742
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Bohemia, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6315898400
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,505,296
- Expenses
- $4,643,642
- Assets
- $3,391,492
- Liabilities
- $1,046,635
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DANIEL C LEVLER (PRESIDENT)
- CHRISTIAN W LIMBACH (VICE PRESIDENT, THRU 9/1/24)
- SEBASTIAN CHIARMONTE (VICE PRESIDENT)
- NICHOLAS PK DE BELLO (VICE PRESIDENT)
- KELLY SHIVERS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- STANLEY HUMIN III (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- BARBARA M O'NEILL (DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS): $161,966 total reported compensation
- DIANE M OLSEN (ACCOUNTANT): $141,078 total reported compensation
- FRANCES GRAFING (OFFICE MANAGER): $119,600 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization safeguards its members by negotiating and enforcing collective bargaining agreements that ensure reasonable compensation, job protection, and advocacy for a safe and healthy workplace to best serve suffolk county. The organization supports its members by providing financial support to the membership and membership families in the form of scholarships and tuition reimbursement.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization was formed to further the interests of its membership by seeking improved terms and conditions of employment, to render moral and material aid to members as needed, to provide representation and/or counsel in legal proceedings, to promote social and fraternal activities, to promote community relations between the department and the citizens it serves, and to promote the community through donations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 72
- Accountability: 28
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 86.1%; rating input score 86; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.1%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.73; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.31; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.4%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 0 of 8 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $162K · 12 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $958K reported
- Consistency: 14 of 15 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 16 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.