Suchma Elementary PTO
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 842661558
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Conroe, TX, USA
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Charter Schools
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $32,077
- Expenses
- $34,944
- Assets
- $46,416
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LaQuita Lewis (President)
- Devin Green (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- LaQuita Lewis (President)
- Devin Green (Vice President)
- LaTrayvia Jenkins (At-Large)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Suchma Parent Teacher Organization (PTO) is a volunteer driven partnership between parents and educators dedicated to enhancing the educational experience at Suchma Elementary. Through active parent involvement, the PTO supports school programs, enriches student learning, and fosters strong connections between home, school, and the community.
What it reported doing in 2025
Student Enrichment Program at Suchma Elementary The Student Enrichment Program at Suchma Elementary enhances classroom experiences by providing educational resources and funding for special events that support both teaching and learning. The program enriches the academic environment, promotes effective instruction, and fosters a positive and engaging school culture. Program Highlights: Classroom Support: Teachers submit wish lists for items such as hands-on manipulatives, indoor games for inclement weather, and rewards to reinforce positive behavior. Grade-level teams may also use funds to support end-of-year classroom celebrations. Test Review Materials: The program funds resources for state standardized test preparation, enabling teachers to conduct creative and low-pressure review sessions that reinforce TEKS in an engaging way. Special Celebration Events: Support is provided for school-wide celebrations such as popcorn for movie day and hot chocolate during the Reindeer Run event before winter break. Field Day: Funding covers equipment and supplies for the school's annual Field Day, a full-day outdoor event held after state testing. T-shirts were also provided for all students (approx. 950) and staff (approx. 120) to encourage unity and school spirit. 6th Grade Clapout: End-of-year celebrations for graduating 6th graders include reward items and activities during the traditional Clapout event, which recognizes students as they transition to junior high. Kindergarten Graduation: The program supports Kindergarten graduation activities by funding refreshments, reward items, and event materials to help families celebrate this important milestone. Impact: Student Benefit: Approximately 950 students benefit from academic enrichment, classroom support, and school-wide celebrations that foster learning and community. Teacher Support: Teachers receive tools and resources that enhance instruction and classroom engagement. Family Engagement: Graduation events and celebration photo opportunities help connect families to the school community, providing joyful, memorable experiences for students and their loved ones.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.9%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.33; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 18.9% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -16.7% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $39K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.