Sucede Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510460145
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Key Biscayne, FL, USA
Phone
3056920141
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Foundations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$226,442
Expenses
$235,933
Assets
$256
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

People named in this filing

  • CARLOS E LANDAZABAL (DIRECTOR)
  • CAROLINA LLOSA (EXCTVE DIREC)
  • JULIO C NORIEGA (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote and facilitate social investment to latin america, especially to south american countries, in order to support teh region's sustainable development. We mobilize funds to finance result-oriented projects that can produce positive social change for poor and excluded individuals and their communities.

What it reported doing in 2024

The initiatives sucede, inc. Supported during 2024 were the following: asociacin sol y luna fundo huincho lt. A-5 urubamba, cusco, peru the sol y luna school works for the education and inclusion of the most vulnerable children of urubamba (cusco, per) and the surrounding communities. As of today, the school has almost 200 students from 20 different communities. Among the services they provide are shelter for abandoned children, education, nutrition, psychological support, and therapeutical care for children with disabilities. Museo de arte de lima (mali) paseo coln 125 lima 1, per museo de arte de lima - mali is a non-profit cultural organization devoted to the promotion of education, arts and culture in per. It houses a representative collection of peruvian art, which witnesses several centuries of cultural transformation, including pre-columbian and colonial objects, as well as republican and contemporary works. Mali receives more than 10,000 students each year as part of student's integral education since arts and culture are key elements in shaping identity and a fundamental basis for the development of the country. Ensea peru av gregorio esocbedo no 426 dpto 1701 jesus maria, lima, peru ensea per is a non-profit organization which strives to see that, by 2032, at least 8 out of 10 peruvian children and young people receive an education of excellence. In a country where only 2 out of 10 rural students perform at grade level, there is an incredible need for a peruvian educational infrastructure that promotes good institutional management and continuity of leadership. Sucede's 2024 support help the implementation of educational projects in the city of lima. Asociacin de hogares nuevo futuro per alfredo silva 180, barranco lima, per hogares nuevo futuro is a non-profit association that promotes and implements actions aimed at preventing child abandonment and maintaining residential shelters (homes) for abandoned children with and without disabilities. Nuevo future provides children with a family environment that meets their biological, psychological, social and spiritual needs. Asociacin frida y manuel delgado parker avenida paseo de la republica 3866 san isidro, lima per in 2024, sucede supported the implementation of the project "urban heroes: challenge for a safer lima," which aims to enhance public safety by strengthening the active role of citizens. This initiative supports existing local projects by identifying, assisting, and helping them grow. Casa khuyana sector patapata s/n calca, cusco per the casa khuyana association is establishing peru's first hospice, where children and young people with terminal illnesses will receive comprehensive, free care. The facility will feature 10 rooms for patients and their families and will offer companionship, support, and professional palliative care to ensure comfort and dignity during difficult times.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 96% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 97
  • Transparency & Controls: 69
  • Accountability: 6
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 97%; rating input score 97
  • Fundraising efficiency: $74.91 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Fail
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 94.2%; rating input score 94; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: Limited
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.2%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 15.3% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 97% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $229K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 17 of 18 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 8 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.