Studio in a School Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 133003112
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2127655900
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $13,009,983
- Expenses
- $12,225,158
- Assets
- $26,884,072
- Liabilities
- $1,161,635
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
35 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- THOMAS CAHILL (PRESIDENT- STUDIO INSTITUTE)
- DAVE WEINER (CONTRACTED INTERIM PRESIDENT (AS 0F 01/2025))
- MARGO AMGOTT (CONTRACTED INTERIM PRESIDENT (THRU 01/2025))
- ALISON SCOTT-WILLIAMS (FORMER PRESIDENT - STUDIO NYC)
Highest reported compensation
- THOMAS CAHILL (PRESIDENT- STUDIO INSTITUTE): $377,397 total reported compensation
- GREGORY PIERSON (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND OPERATIONS): $199,079 total reported compensation
- TRICIA BLANCHARD (DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT): $175,544 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
From classrooms to careers, studio in a school expands access to visual arts education and professions in the arts by partnering with practicing artists, schools, and cultural institutions.
What it reported doing in 2024
Studio in a school association operates two independent llc's: 1) studio in a school nyc, llc reaffirms the organization's commitment to direct service. Each year it provides quality visual arts instruction to 30,272 students from pre-k through 12th grade, in-school and after-school, in partnership with 173 schools and educational sites citywide. 2) studio institute, llc provides professional learning programs for educational systems, partnership programs with cultural and community organizations, arts internships, and the dissemination of arts education research in local and national forums. With a mandate to replicate and disseminate studio's model, the institute now offers programs in boston, cleveland, memphis, newark, philadelphia and providence, as well as in New York city. In both llc's, studio's approach is distinguished by: - the commitment of our artist instructors, who are professional, exhibitng artists trained in studio's methodology. - a practice of genuine collaboration with educational and cultural partners. - a dedication to share our teaching practices through professional development and training to our artist instructors and public school art teachers. - curricula and learning experiences that are age-appropriate and materials-rich and have measurable impacts. - a consistent emphasis on accountability. Teen apprenticeship program (tap) (tap) summer 2024 provided 64 teens paid internships in local community-based organization summer camps teaching visual arts to young children ages 5-10 years, for 25 hours per week. (tap) spring 2025, provided 59 teens from 18 nyc schools (brooklyn, manhattan, queens) apprenticeship-based learning classes comprised of 51 hours of arts and teaching-skills development led by professional artists. Bloomberg arts internship (bai) bai summer 2024 provided 100 high school juniors from 15 nyc public high schools with paid internships at 49 cultural sector partner organizations, mentoring, writing classes, public speaking workshops, enriching cultural excursions, and guidance for developing college applications. Through the arts, interns develop workforce readiness skills and build a clear pipeline toward creative careers while deepening their understanding of the city's creative landscape and their sense of civic connection. Studio intensives, fall 2024, provides free art training to New York city public high school students in grades 10-12 who are considering applying to bachelor of fine arts programs. The goal of the program is to help students develop their technical skills and build their art portfolios in preparation for applying to art schools and to be part of an exhibition experience at the studio in a school gallery. Offered on saturdays or during school breaks within the academic year, intensives are led by professional artists with the assistance of a trained studio assistant. Instruction, art supplies, and metrocards are provided at no charge. Through studio institute, studio offers two college programs to support college students: 1) arts intern college program summer 2024 provided 64 summer internships and through a pilot program with cleveland state university, 7 fall/ 5 spring internships, within 53 arts and cultural institutions across the nation. Interns work four days per week at their worksite and one day each week engage in educational activities such as curated visits to arts and cultural organizations, presentations, and seminars with arts administration professionals. Arts intern provided paid internships at museums and cultural institutions in baltimore, boston, chicago, cleveland, memphis, newark (nj), New York city, philadelphia, and providence. 2) college mentor programs provide summer employment to 21 college students who serve as mentors to high school students in two internship programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 89% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 92
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 76.2%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: $28.54 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 82.3%; rating input score 82; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 95.5%; rating input score 95; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.2; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.6%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77% of revenue deployed · 76.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 22 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 8 filed program accomplishments · $9.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $377K · 35 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $134K reported
- Consistency: 38 of 39 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 105 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 99 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.