Stroum Jewish Commmunity Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 910635236
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2011
- Official website data refreshed
- Jun 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011
- Location
- Mercer Island, WA, USA
- Phone
- 2063880834
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Neighborhood Centers
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $18,139,824
- Expenses
- $8,077,101
- Assets
- $15,173,421
- Liabilities
- $3,462,020
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the stroum jewish community center is to ensure jewish continuity to support jewish unity to enrich jewish life and to participate in and promote the well-being of the jewish and general community and the people of israel
What it reported doing in 2011
Youth camp and family accomplishes the center's purpose by developing camp programs for school age children and by developing social cultural and educational affiliations for adults and families in general. The youth and camp program served 3200 individual program participants and the adult service program served 750 individual program participants.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 61% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 55
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 55.5%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.88; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.5%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $6.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $199K · 21 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 28 of 30 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 1 filing year from 2011
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule G event receipts did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.