Strong Foodla Kitchen

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
461639779
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2018
Forms available
Form 990 2018
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Phone
8182138915
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Food Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,580,584
Expenses
$3,097,038
Assets
$2,769,714
Liabilities
$2,189,423

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROBERT EGGER (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • ROBERT EGGER (CEO): $108,472 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of l.a. Kitchen is to reclaim healthy, local food that would otherwise go to waste, and use it to empower, nourish, and engage the community. L.a. Kitchen operates three programs to achieve this goal. Empower l.a. Is a 15-week intergenerational culinary job-training program that empowers emancipated foster youth and older adults transitioning out of incarceration to thrive in careers in the food service industry. Impact l.a. Works directly with local farmers and wholesale companies to collect fruits and vegetables that are cosmetically unsalable, recruits thousands of angelinos to transform these raw fruits and vegetables into nutritious meals and snacks and distributes the food products to social service agencies that serve los angeles' low-income and aging populations. In addition, strong food, a social enterprise business, hires graduates of empower l.a. And uses purchased foods to create healthy meals and products for contracts, wholesale and retail sales.

What it reported doing in 2018

During 2017, l.a. Kitchen was able to facilitate culinary job training program for 80 transition age foster youth, formerly incarcerated adults and recently housed individuals, recover 432,650 pounds of produce that would otherwise be thrown away, engaged with 5,200 volunteers and prepared 136,000 healthy meals. L.a. Kitchen partnered with 20 community partners for the distribution of meals, snacks and fresh cut produce.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The required major-donor schedule is missing or incomplete and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 75
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 76.4%; rating input score 76
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.94 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: No; rating input score 0
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -95.9%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.89; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.79; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.5%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 31.7% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 76.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 14 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $108K · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2014 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Major donor itemization scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.