Striving for All
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 844273969
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Clovis, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8162067001
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $176,712
- Expenses
- $145,837
- Assets
- $146,861
- Liabilities
- $62,386
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Genevieve Ngambia (Founder and CEO)
People named in this filing
- Genevieve Ngambia (Founder and CEO)
- Joshua McDaniel (CTO)
- Olena Baykur (Co-Founder & CFO)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve access to education and health services in underserved communities by delivering locally driven programs and international initiatives focused on youth development, mental health support, workforce development, and community well-being.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization provided youth-focused mental health services and targeted community support for vulnerable populations. In 2025, activities were primarily focused on mental health initiatives addressing emotional well-being and resilience among underserved and displaced communities. Program services also included support for children through the provision of school supplies, tuition assistance, and other essential resources to improve access to education and overall well-being.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 73.6%; rating input score 74
- Program expense ratio: 89.1%; rating input score 89
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.5%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.01; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.42; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 36.4% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 52.3% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 73.6% of revenue deployed · 89.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $130K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.