Streetsigns Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 363922635
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- Pittsboro, NC, USA
- Phone
- 9195425406
- Rating
- 93
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Drunk Driving Related
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $50,709
- Expenses
- $54,086
- Assets
- $5,855
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN MCGOWAN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ELISABETH LEWIS CORLEY (SECRETARY)
- JOSEPH MEGEL (TREASURER)
- JOHN MCGOWAN (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The streetsigns center for literature and performance is a performing arts and educational center based in pittsboro, nc. The center presents and develops new literary adaptations, self-created theatrical works, innovative new plays, and bold re-imagining of classics.
What it reported doing in 2024
Streetsigns continued its partnership with the process series: new works in development, whose 2024-25 season, yes, and...," celebrated the voices of the artists through whose eyes we see our world anew and the process through which those artists arrive at the works we see. The season brought everything from improv comedy to cello improvisation to a one- person show featuring more than twenty-five different characters to a new rock banjo opera.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 93
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.8%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 88.9%; rating input score 89
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.7%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.11; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 9%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94.8% of revenue deployed · 88.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $48K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.