Street Level Health Project
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 562324355
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Oakland, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5105339954
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Treatment Facilities, Primarily Outpatient
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,627,551
- Expenses
- $1,242,786
- Assets
- $2,736,232
- Liabilities
- $169,700
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Gabriela Galicia (Executive Dir.): $135,177 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Health Care for All is the heart of the Oakland-based grassroots organization Street Level Health Project Street Level. Incorporated in 2001, Street Level is a critical entry point into the healthcare and social service system for those most often overlooked.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Immigrant Rights and Empowerment program offers a space for day laborers and low wage workers to build community, organize, and advocate for issues impacting their community. The Oakland Workers' Collective has components: vocational, training, leadership development, and employment linkage. In 2024 we provided 441 placements to workers participating in the project, Moreover, we developed relationships with 131 non-duplicated employers, some of whom retain OWC workers post initial placement. Through our street outreach to day laborers at the 6 different sites we provided outreach and education and min-workshops on topics such as workplace health and safety, employment rights, health and wellness training, Know Your Rights, professionalism at the workplace and COVID education and prevention including providing PPE. We have continued our collaboration with Centro Legal de la Raza and Causa Justa: Just Cause to provide a wraparound service model that responds to the basic needs of low wage workers in Alameda County. We have also continued collaboration to support community education around the issue of minimum wage with seven agencies in Oakland through the Fair Labor Oakland Coalition. Lastly, we continued with our collaboration with the regional coalition of day laborer organizations in Northern California and with our participation with the National Day Laborer Organizing Network.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 83
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 52.1%; rating input score 52
- Program expense ratio: 68%; rating input score 68
- Fundraising efficiency: $105.25 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 23.6%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.2; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.9%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.6% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 52.1% of revenue deployed · 68% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $846K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $135K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.