Street Angels Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 812677198
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Wauwatosa, WI, USA
- Phone
- 4147392467
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,532,098
- Expenses
- $1,399,391
- Assets
- $1,233,405
- Liabilities
- $149,142
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JANICE WILBERG PHD (PRESIDENT)
- VICKY CORDANI (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- SHELLY SARASIN (EXECUTIVE CO-DIRECTOR): $79,379 total reported compensation
- EVA WELCH (EXECUTIVE CO-DIRECTOR): $79,303 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Street angels is a mobile outreach organization dedicated to assisting individuals in ending their homelessness by providing dignified services, advocacy, connections to critical resources, and hope.
What it reported doing in 2024
Founded in 2016, street angels is a mobile outreach organization dedicated to assisting individuals in ending their unsheltered homelessness by providing dignified services, advocacy, a consistent support system, connections to critical resources, and hope. Staff and volunteers travel directly to those who are experiencing unsheltered homelessness in milwaukee county to provide assistance in meeting immediate basic needs and long-term solutions. The organization is currently providing boots-on-the-ground programming five days a week through the mobile outreach and showers of hope shower trailer programs. Additionally, a pathway assistance program is available case-by-case to assist with the removal of immediate barriers on one's pathway to stability. Through these efforts, street angels remain committed to building trust, fostering hope, making critical connections to resources, and empowering individuals on their journey toward safe and stable housing. In 2025, staff and volunteers connected with a unique 2,057 individuals of which 1,247 were verified to be experiencing unsheltered homelessness. Throughout the year the outreach programs also provided 19,618 hot meals + 26,286 bag lunches, 854 showers, 182 emergency hotel nights (families/elderly), and 125 individuals or families were assisted in connecting to housing or shelter resources ending their unsheltered homelessness.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 41% for direct work, and 59% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.2%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 89.8%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $35.24 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.7%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.88; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.3%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 29.1% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 26.6% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 32% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.2% of revenue deployed · 89.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $79K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.