Strawberry Point Lutheran Home
Legal name: Strawberry Point Lutheran Home for the Aged
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 420810175
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Strawberry Point, IA, US
- Phone
- 1-563-933-6037
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,579,131
- Expenses
- $2,732,114
- Assets
- $11,902,675
- Liabilities
- $245,805
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KRIS MORAREND (PRESIDENT FY)
Highest reported compensation
- LORI EASTLICK (NIGHT SHIFT): $122,807 total reported compensation
- LAUREN JONES (DIRECTOR OF): $108,653 total reported compensation
- AMBER CONDUFF (EXECUTIVE DI): $97,527 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A Christian nonprofit nursing facility providing a quality of life rooted in dignity, respect, and compassion for residents—serving the community since 1940. Memory Care Manor at Strawberry Point Lutheran Home offers an environment for people to live, not just reside. We encourage freedom within a secure setting. Our goal is to maximize independence in a safe environment. We provide a community where dependent adults with dementia receive care and support in the Christian spirit of love and compassion. Memory Care Manor, a dementia CCDI unit, provides for residents who meet the criteria needing a secure environment having boundaries and activities to enhance the life of the person struggling with memory and/or behavioral diagnosis. memory-care-manor-logo.
What it reported doing in 2025
Provided skilled and intermediate residential care operating independent living for seniors in a 36-unit facility and a 16 bed nursing facility for chronically confused and dementing illnesses (ccdi) residents.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 82% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.2%; rating input score 91
- Program expense ratio: 87.8%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.9%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.36; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 91.2% of revenue deployed · 87.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $123K · 12 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $114K reported
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.