Stratford High School Class of 2029 Project Prom

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
392621626
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Houston, TX, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Student Services, Organizations of Students

Reported finances

Revenue
$43,370
Expenses
$6,680
Assets
$37,231
Liabilities
$541

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Gretchen Montalbo (Treasurer)
  • Stephanie Parker (Peer Group Leader)
  • Kimberly Berg (Peer Group Leader)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Stratford High School Project Prom is a parent led volunteer organization that supports the students and parent of Stratford High School with information and assistance on both completing high school and the testing application process for post high-school education and work opportunities. The organization raises funds to host the after prom Project Prom for each Senior class. This celebration is free of charge for all Senior Class students and provides a safe place to gather after prom that is alcohol and tobacco free. All funds will be raised through the sales of merchandise such as spirit t-shirts or social events open to all students families. All funds will be used to either fund the operations of the entity such as bank fees and web hosting or spent on the party - food security decor entertainment.

What it reported doing in 2025

Our peer group meetings provide over 100 parents of students at Stratford High School with pertinent information regarding navigating the high school process during high school and beyond. We provided two meetings during 2025.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 80
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 84.6%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.57; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.