Strafford Network

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
020523875
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2012
Forms available
Form 990 2012, Form 990-EZ 2009
Location
Rochester, NH, USA
Phone
6033352210
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$226,291
Expenses
$384,896
Assets
$110,137
Liabilities
$12,092

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Strafford network strengthens efficient, accessible and high quality human services for strafford county residents. To achieve its mission, strafford network:- dentifiies collabrative opportunities to fill service gaps;- maximizes individual organizational strengths;- seeks, administers, and/or brokers new and on-going resources;- advocates for the construction and expension of strafford county based services; and - serves as a communication link among the human service providers in strafford county.

What it reported doing in 2012

Servicelink resource center was developed in 2000 to provide free information and referral services throughout the state and to connect seniors and adults with disabilities, and their families, with appropriate services that support healthy and independent living.the top reasons people contacted servicelink last year were: - to receive long term care counseling or information - to receive medicare counseling or information or to enroll in a medicare prescription plan (part d) - to receive assistance filling out forms or applications - to receive caregiver support or counseling - to receive general information about, or referral to, area resourceshighlights of the past year include: - the aging and disability resource center (adrc) reached 4976 consumers through presentations, health fairs and medicare enrollment events throughout strafford county. - 888 individuals received medicare counseling through office visits, home visits, telephone and email contacts. - slrc made 5,528 contacts to partnering agencies seeking assistance on behalf of consumers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 97% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 15
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -70.1%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12.2%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -11% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -34.8% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $362K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $47K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2011 to 2012
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.