Stowe Land Trust
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 030307155
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Stowe, VT, USA
- Phone
- 8022537221
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Land Resources Conservation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,904,506
- Expenses
- $1,613,915
- Assets
- $7,924,711
- Liabilities
- $147,147
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TOM ROGERS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- METZI ANDERSON (DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS): $104,395 total reported compensation
- TOM ROGERS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $59,775 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The stowe land trust is dedicated to the conservation of scenic, recreational, and productive farm and forest lands for the benefit of the greater stowe community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Stewardship programin fy25, slt advanced major trail accessibility improvements at the mill trail, completing design, permitting, and key bridge and trail upgrades as part of phase 1 of a new universally accessible trail system. Slt also finished adaptive bike enhancements at kirchner woods and began planning a new connector trail at the adams camp connector property to link the stowe recreation path with the adams camp network.to support growing stewardship needs, slt engaged an americorps lands and trails steward and continued annual property monitoring, landowner engagement, and trail and habitat management. The stewardship program worked with 98 volunteers who collectively donated over 454 hours of their time to taking care of slt protected lands, completing monitoring, trail work, and invasive species management.slt also hosted a stewardship summer series which engaged 135 participants in 315 hours of educational programming focused on habitat, invasive species, and forest stewardship.land protection programslt completed the permanent protection of the 85-acre adams camp connector, strengthening wildlife habitat, riparian health, and regional trail connectivity. Slt also advanced three major conservation projectsmuddy moose, north hill forest, and stagecoach meadowstotaling 339 acres and scheduled to close next year.slt has been working hard to advance innovative conservation and housing initiatives in partnership with downstreet housing & community development. The muddy moose and stagecoach meadows projects have both conservation and housing components and if successful, will conserve land while also creating future affordable housing.slt is also updating its strategic conservation plan, supported by grant funding and an in-depth gis analysis across an expanded service area. The plan focuses on farms and forests, wildlife and biodiversity, recreation, and flood resilience. Following community outreach, the plan is on track for completion next year. Education & outreach programslt revitalized the learning landscapes program with stowe elementary school, providing hands-on outdoor education to 191 students and families. Slt hosted its largest community eventparty in the meadowwith 315 attendees, and participated in partner events reaching an estimated 250300 community members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 65%; rating input score 65
- Program expense ratio: 71.1%; rating input score 71
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.12 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.3%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.91; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.2%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -9.4% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 65% of revenue deployed · 71.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $104K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 31/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.