Stoughton Hospital Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 390832914
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Stoughton, WI, USA
- Phone
- 6088736611
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $82,201,540
- Expenses
- $69,553,518
- Assets
- $141,670,688
- Liabilities
- $21,965,401
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Daniel DeGroot (President/CEO - until Dec)
- Christopher Brabant (President/CEO as of Nov)
- Amy Hermes CNO (Vice President of Patient Services)
Highest reported compensation
- Dr Ashish Rawal (Medical Staff Rep): $897,332 total reported compensation
- Dr Aaron Schwaab (Chief of Staff): $511,459 total reported compensation
- Daniel DeGroot (President/CEO - until Dec): $456,449 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of Stoughton Hospital is to provide safe, quality health care with exceptional personalized service.
What it reported doing in 2024
Stoughton Hospital Association is an acute care, critical access hospital, fully accredited by DNV, licensed by the state of Wisconsin and a member of the Wisconsin Hospital Association and Rural Wisconsin Health Cooperative. The Hospital provides inpatient and outpatient services to its patients. Inpatient services include medical/surgical, telemetry, intensive care, inpatient rehabilitative care (commonly referred to as swing bed) and geriatric psychiatry care. In 2025, there were 4,581 inpatient days. In addition to inpatient services, the Hospital provides a variety of outpatient services including emergency room care, urgent care, medical imaging (including in-house MRI services), surgical services, ambulatory infusion center, occupational health, rehabilitation services, (Statement continued on Schedule O)breast care services, cardiology, foot care, health screenings, lab, podiatry, sleep disorder services, vein treatment services and wound care services.To fulfill its mission of community service, the Hospital provides care to patients who meet certain criteria under its charity care policy without charge or at amounts less than its established rates. Revenue from services to these patients is recorded in the accounting system at the established rates, but the Hospital does not pursue collection of the amounts. The resulting adjustments are recorded as adjustments to patient service revenue, depending on the timing of the charity determination.The Hospital provides health care services to patients who meet certain criteria under its charity care policy without charge or at amounts less than established rates. Since the Hospital does not pursue collection of these amounts, they are not reported as revenue. The estimated cost of providing these services was $259,000 for the year ended September 30, 2025, which was determined based on an average ratio of cost to gross charges related to the services provided. Additionally, the Hospital extends discounts to uninsured patients. The estimated costs of providing services related to the discounts was $443,000 for the year ended September 30, 2025, which was determined based on an average ratio of cost to gross charges related to the services provided.In addition, the Hospital provides services to other patients under certain government-reimbursed public aid programs. Such programs pay providers amounts which are less than established charges for the services provided to the recipients, and for some services the payments are less than the cost of rendering the services provided.The Hospital also commits significant time and resources to endeavors and critical services which meet otherwise unfulfilled community needs. Many of these activities are sponsored with the knowledge that they will not be self-supporting or financially viable
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 93% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 70.4%; rating input score 70
- Program expense ratio: 82%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.59 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.4%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.04; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.1%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 70.4% of revenue deployed · 82% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $57M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $897K · 24 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $12.1M reported
- Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 14 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 34/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.