Stop Foodborne Illness Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
452742509
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
Phone
7732696555
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Nutrition

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$123,692
Expenses
$1,027,690
Assets
$1,086,696
Liabilities
$25,070

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SANDRA ESKINS (CEO)
  • MITZI BAUM (FMR-CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • SANDRA ESKINS (CEO): $152,239 total reported compensation
  • Vanessa Coffman (ALLIANCE DIRECTOR): $110,629 total reported compensation
  • MITZI BAUM (FMR-CEO): $28,152 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

As the voice of people affected by foodborne illness, we collaborate with partners in academia, the food industry, and government to prevent foodborne illness. We advocate for effective food safety policy and facilitate culture change to increase food safety.

What it reported doing in 2025

Support and Resources for ConsumersSTOP has become the leading resource for consumers who experience foodborne illness or are seeking more information about food safety. On its website, STOP offers consumers an e-recall option that customizes recall notices or other food safety alerts geographically and by interest, so that consumers receive just the alerts that are pertinent to them for greater impact. The number of consumers who have signed up for these e-alerts has grown exponentially over the last few years as consumers recognize the importance of being better-informed about food safety issues. STOP also provides a forum for those who have suffered from or lost a loved one to foodborne illness to tell their stories and raise awareness among the public about the short- and long-term impact foodborne illnesses can have and how they might be prevented. STOP helps these constituent advocates tell their stories to industry and government leaders who have within their power the ability to make real and lasting changes to food safety culture in the United States. Advocacy and Food Safety Policy One significant area of work for STOP is that of advocacy for better food safety regulation and policy at the federal, state, and local levels to protect consumers. STOP provides a voice for those who have been harmed by bacteria that are legally allowed to be in foods put into commerce. We believe that feeding your family should not be a high-risk activity; therefore, we focus on issues that will impact the full spectrum of consumers. Currently, STOP is working to reduce harmful Salmonella in poultry products, is campaigning to include Cronobacter sakazakii on the reportable diseases list, and working collaboratively with the food industry, associations, and other advocacy organizations to move FDA to a proactive regulatory agency rather than continuing its culture of reactivity.Alliance to Stop Foodborne IllnessThe Alliance to Stop Foodborne Illness has been instrumental in forming vital relationships between stakeholders in the field of food safety. Through the Alliance, STOP has become a trusted resource for information and training materials to be utilized with organizations of every size to influence a companys food safety culture through focusing on continually developing food safety knowledge, beliefs, and practices. The Alliance is made possible by the increasingly recognized need for more cooperative approaches to food safety and the importance of strong, mature food safety cultures across food producers and distributors, and at every step of the food production chain. The shift from disconnected to collaborative action is grounded in the common goals of many industry food safety leaders and consumer advocates to prevent illness through best practices, continuous improvement, and strong corporate food safety cultures. Dave Theno FellowshipSince 2018, the Alliance has offered the Dave Theno Food Safety Fellowship to one recent graduate (within five years) with a food science, animal science, political science, or public health undergraduate or graduate degree from an accredited college or university with a grade point average of 3.0 or higher. Preference will be given to those seeking a career in the food industry or food regulation. The Fellow completes a 12-credit Online Food Safety Certificate with Michigan State University, is mentored by the Alliance, and works with Stop Foodborne Illness in Chicago, IL.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 62
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 88%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: $2.46 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -730.8%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.06; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 28.3%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 18.3% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 88% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $904K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $152K · 19 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 11/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule G fundraiser detail did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.