Stoneybrook Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 204543496
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2012, Form 990-T 2021, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- Acme, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7246133312
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $465,713
- Expenses
- $476,382
- Assets
- $465,931
- Liabilities
- $44,746
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUZANNE WARD (PRESIDENT)
- JENNIFER LEARN (VICE PRESIDENT / SECRETARY)
People named in this filing
- SUZANNE WARD (PRESIDENT)
- JENNIFER LEARN (VICE PRESIDENT / SECRETARY)
- AMY CALDWELL (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To maintain a multifaceted therapeutic equestrian center providing equine facilitied therapy for the handicapped
What it reported doing in 2024
Their minds as well as their bodies. In 2018, we had many students, most of whom were children with a diagnosis and the specific challenges a student might face, our program can help of autism. Depending on the diagnosis them in multiple ways. The children with autism grow to better understand the importance of listening well, communicating clearly, following directions, etc. At the same time, they develop stength in their core, gain better hand-to-eye coordination and improve their balance. For others with a difference diagnosis, the program may help to increase the students flexibility, help them to learn to trust, or give them the opportunity to participate in a recreational activity otherwise unavailable to them.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.4%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 74.8%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: $595.99 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.3%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.98; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 76.4% of revenue deployed · 74.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $356K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.