Stonebrook Project Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
823378063
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Catoosa, OK, USA
Phone
9186306711
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation

Reported finances

Revenue
$159,582
Expenses
$136,867
Assets
$36,630

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • EDITH TOLBERT (CEO)
  • AARON DAVIS (President)
  • COURTNEY HALL (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • EDITH TOLBERT (CEO)
  • AARON DAVIS (President)
  • COURTNEY HALL (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provides Hope through connection, care, and community by providing complimentary oncology massage therapy services to men and women currntly in treatment for cancer and through hosting a monthly Community Cancer Group.

What it reported doing in 2025

Hosted 21 Breast Health Education Sessions for approximately 551 women. Hosted 174 attendees across 11 Community Cancer Group meetings. Provided 109 hours in chair massage for NOEK patients before radiation and 509 hours hand/foot massages for patients in the OSCRI chemo infusion room. Provided 327 oncology massages at Bershire on 66 and the Palms Massage & Wellness, as well as 60 manual lymphatic drainage sessions at NEOK.There are 236 cancer clients including: 47 in active treatment, 67 lifetime clients, 18 MLD clients, and 104 who have completed treatment.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59.5%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 69.4%; rating input score 69

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 14.2%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 20.8% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 59.5% of revenue deployed · 69.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $95K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.