Stone Ridge Foundation National Center for Healthy Veterans
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 842852661
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Altavista, VA, USA
- Phone
- 8883174677
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Military, Veterans' Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,894,209
- Expenses
- $2,489,751
- Assets
- $8,016,328
- Liabilities
- $2,083,496
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT DEES (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- JANINE CAMPBELL (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE & CHIE): $67,846 total reported compensation
- JACOB CORWIN (COO): $64,000 total reported compensation
- ROBERT DEES (PRESIDENT & CEO): $60,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To deliver a comprehensive program that leverages private sector resources, expertise and proven faith based programs to help return healthy veterans to productive leaders in america and alleviate the behavioral and mental health challenges many veterans face.
What it reported doing in 2025
Provided facility for use by veterans and families in a one year residential program providing lodging and programs to provide counseling, coaching, and mentoring thru group living.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 53.1%; rating input score 53
- Program expense ratio: 83.1%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $20.6 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 36.1%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.22; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.26; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.7%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 30.8% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 34.7% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 31% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 53.1% of revenue deployed · 83.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $68K · 10 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $2.7M reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.