Stone Haven
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 854023655
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Harrisonburg, VA, USA
- Phone
- 5408300897
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Residential Mental Health Treatment
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $145,622
- Expenses
- $68,239
- Assets
- $175,845
- Liabilities
- $291
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENNIFER TESTA (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SYDNEY HAYSLETT (EXECUTIVE DI)
- JENNIFER TESTA (PRESIDENT)
- MORGAN EYE (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of stone haven is to walk alongside women in their journey of healing from sexual exploitation. We offer drop-in services consisting of case management, community referrals, and a safe space for support. These services began in march of 2024. Since then, we've been able to serve 20 clients and support them with hygiene items, food, clothing, and referrals for rental assistance, legal help, and mental health care. In addition to these services, funds raised are going toward opening a residential treatment program for survivors to come and recover from trauma and move toward a life of freedom and independence.
What it reported doing in 2024
Drop-in services providing case management, referrals to community parnters, safe space for support and encouragement, hygeine items, rent assistance, and legal support. Served 20 clients in this past fiscal year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 81% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 38.8%; rating input score 39
- Program expense ratio: 80.1%; rating input score 80
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 53.1%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.58; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 51.3%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 44.9% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 45% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 56.2% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 38.8% of revenue deployed · 80.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $55K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.