Stone City Fastpitch
Legal name: Stone City Softball Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 300100359
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Minooka, IL, USA
- Phone
- 8152523973
- Rating
- 33
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Baseball, Softball
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $75,540
- Expenses
- $123,644
- Assets
- $401,594
- Liabilities
- $163,443
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENNIFER STEFFES (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JENNIFER STEFFES (PRESIDENT)
- SARA MACAK (SECRETARY)
- JEN SEARLS (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
At Stone City Fastpitch, our mission is to foster a supportive environment dedicated to the development and empowerment of young women. We are committed to building integrity, resilience, and physical strength through our comprehensive softball program. By offering year round training, including specialized winter sessions, we aim to equip our athletes with the skills and confidence they need to succeed both on and off the field. Our goal is to nurture not only outstanding athletes but also strong, empowered individuals who embody the true spirit of teamwork and sportsmanship.
What it reported doing in 2024
Softball training for girls ages 8 through 18. To provide opportunity for young girls from all economic backgrounds in the chicago area to develop the skills necessary to earn a college scholarship while developing life skills to be successful.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -63.7%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.25; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.41; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -89.9% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.