Stomp the Bullying Inc Stomp the Bullying Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
462187135
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Lake Worth, FL, USA
Phone
5613735617
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,171
Expenses
$16,705
Assets
$8,154
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SEAN KELLEY (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SEAN KELLEY (PRESIDENT)
  • LORI KELLEY (SECRETARY)
  • SEAN GORDON (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Bulling is a major epidemic in our society. According to statistics, 19,000 bullied children attempt to commit suicide over the course of one year; on a monthly average 160,000 children miss school because they fear being bullied. To get children and adults to understand the full effects of bulling and why "bully's" bully; to teach children how to come together and stand up against bullies - strength in numbers. To instill confidence and emotional defenses to protect victims against verbal bulling and to empower victims with self-defense techniques and principles to protect against physical bulling.

What it reported doing in 2025

To get children and adults to understand the full effects of bullying and why "bully's" bully. To teach children how to come together and stand up against bullies - strength in numbers; to instill confidence and emotional defenses to protect victims aginst verbal bulling and to employer victims with sef-defense techniques and principles to protect against physical bulling.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -26.8%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 15.8% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21.5% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.