Stockton Art League
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 946088816
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Stockton, CA, USA
- Phone
- 2094666604
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $122,289
- Expenses
- $112,742
- Assets
- $344,302
- Liabilities
- $42,043
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JESSICA FONG (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- ELAZAR ABRAHAM (PRESIDENT)
- DENNY AH-TYE (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JESSICA FONG (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- ELAZAR ABRAHAM (PRESIDENT)
- DENNY AH-TYE (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote art in san joaquin county by: a) providing and promoting programs, workshops, classes, and activities that will encourage the exchange of ideas between members. B) providing and promoting cultural exchange with other organizations concerned with the creative arts and the community at large. C) aiding in the building of art appreciation in san joaquin county. D) providing opportunities for exhibitions of works of arts and crafts for members, both as individuals and as a group.
What it reported doing in 2024
Promoted art awareness in the community. Art auctions and art shows were held during the year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 64.1%; rating input score 64
- Program expense ratio: 56.4%; rating input score 56
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.8%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.05; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 64.1% of revenue deployed · 56.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $64K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.