Sound Salmon Solutions
Legal name: Stilly-snohomish Fisheries Enhancement Task Force Dba Sound Salmon Solutions
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 911484389
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Mukilteo, WA, US
- Phone
- 425.252.6686
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fisheries Resources
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,048,584
- Expenses
- $1,033,831
- Assets
- $382,614
- Liabilities
- $52,431
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAKE KIRSCHNER (PRESIDENT)
- MICHELLE BAHNICK (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MARY L BRUEGGEMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MARY L BRUEGGEMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $101,716 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To protect and promote salmon recovery through education, restoration, and stewardship.
What it reported doing in 2024
Education and hatchery programs: our hatchery located at the willow creek salmon and watershed education center raised 80,000 coho salmon which were then released into 9 local tributaries within lake Washington and puget sound watersheds. Volunteers helped with every stage of the salmon rearing process, giving over 1892 hours in the year 2024.in 2024, sss engaged 7226 youth and adults in lessons that forged a connection between the community and salmon recovery while empowering participants to make positive changes for the future of pacific salmon.our salmon in schools program brought coho salmon to 26 schools where students raised them from the egg to fry stage while learning the importance of salmon to our ecosystem, economy, and culture in Washington. Students then joined sss educators on a field trip where they released their salmon into a local stream.sss partnered with the snohomish county juvenile court to provide the youth exploring stream science (yess) program. Yess engages youth from the scjc diversion program in meaningful and hands-on watershed science experiences. Youth who qualify for diversion programs have been charged with a crime and sentenced to detention, however, due to the low risk of re-offense, have been given the option to complete community-based service learning with sss. This program has been a wonderful success as we have seen students who had the 'too cool for school' persona blossom into budding scientists, full of knowledge about salmon and their habitat. Sss hosted a summer camp at the hatchery in edmonds where campers spent time outside learning about their local environment and how they can be stewards for their communities. 3 weeks of camp were offered in 2024, hosting 58 campers total. Several local schools and scout troops also visited the hatchery for outdoor field trips reaching over 6336 youth.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 94% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 72.9%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $3,185.12 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.4%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.8%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 7 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 72% of revenue deployed · 72.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $754K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $102K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.