Stevens Hope for Children
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 260009529
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020
- Location
- Upland, CA, USA
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $152,146
- Expenses
- $196,374
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANTHONY CAPPELLI (PRESIDENT)
- SANDRA CAPPELLI (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ANTHONY CAPPELLI (PRESIDENT): $34,398 total reported compensation
- SANDRA CAPPELLI (VICE PRESIDENT): $12,718 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support families of seriously ill or injured children with a variety of programs to lessen the burdens of their childs illness and recovery. Benefits include temporary housing, food, transportation, clothing for the kids, family activities, and interaction with volunteers.
What it reported doing in 2020
The housing for hope program provides temporary accommodations to families while their child receives critical inpatient or outpatient care near loma linda university medical center and childrens hospital. Four 2-bedroom/2 bathroom fully furnished apartments are available for families referred to stevens hope from hospital social workers. Families are able to stay in the apartments for up to 6 months or more, depending on the condition of the child. Apartments include all linens, furniture, appliances, computers, phone and tv service, toys and games for kids of all ages. This is the familys home away from home until the physician allows the family to return to their home. It is a true home-away-from-home.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 95
- Accountability: 65
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 77.5%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.13 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -29.1%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 24%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -6% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.9% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -9.2% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 77.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 8 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $152K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $34K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2012 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.