Stevens Elementary School Pto
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 831509507
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Houston, TX, USA
- Phone
- 5126950740
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $72,564
- Expenses
- $44,434
- Assets
- $76,770
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Alex Summitt (President)
People named in this filing
- Shaunessy Bostic Riddick (Treasurer)
- Alex Summitt (President)
- Dave Forand (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Corporation is organized and operated exclusively for charitable, religious, scientific, literary and educational purposes within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3) of the Code and Section 11.18(c) of the Texas Tax Code, as the same may be amended, modified or supplemented from time to time. The purpose of the Corporation shall be to improve the educational experience of all students at Lulu B. Stevens Elementary School in the Houston Independent School District.
What it reported doing in 2025
Teacher Support: Awarded Teacher Grants, directly supporting classroom needs and enhancing the learning environment for students. STEAM Education: Provided students with enriching STEAM field trip opportunities. Extracurricular Activities: Supported diverse student interests by funding various school clubs. Academic Recognition: Celebrated student achievements through engaging scholastic achievement ceremonies. Social Development: Enhanced the school environment with the purchase of small, safe playground equipment for social enrichment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 87% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 53.4%; rating input score 53
- Program expense ratio: 87.2%; rating input score 87
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 38.8%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.73; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -10.1% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 178.6% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 50.6% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 53.4% of revenue deployed · 87.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $39K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.