Steven M and Tani Denae Day Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 882198637
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- St George, UT, USA
- Phone
- 4356739479
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $3,034
- Assets
- $1,581
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEVEN DAY (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- STEVEN DAY (PRESIDENT)
- TANI DENAE DAY (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The corporation is organized exclusively for charitable, educational, and/or scientific purposes, including, providing funding to promote education development and advancement of mental, physical and spiritual wellness and health, and to promote the protection, research and conservation of endangered species and protection of all animals. Said purpose may include fundraising and distributing financial assistance to individuals in the united states or other countries engaged in service consistent with the corporations mission and vision, and/or distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt organizations under section 501(c) (3) of the internal revenue code, or the corresponding section of any future federal tax code.
What it reported doing in 2025
Charitable, educational, and/or scientific purposes, including, providing funding to promote education development and advancement of mental, physical and spiritual wellness and health, and to promote the protection, research and conservation of endangered species and protection of all animals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 99% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 38
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.52; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -22.4% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -148.3% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -82% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.