Stephanie Waterman Tennis Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431394444
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Kansas City, MO, USA
- Phone
- 8168051801
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $61,113
- Expenses
- $69,893
- Assets
- $116,818
- Liabilities
- $4,017
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Scott Hanover (Executive Director)
- Amy Hatch (President)
- Lisa Hendricks (Director / Past President)
People named in this filing
- Scott Hanover (Executive Director)
- Amy Hatch (President)
- Lisa Hendricks (Director / Past President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Providing tennis, education & life-skills to underserved youth.
What it reported doing in 2024
SWF Tennis reaches 1,800 students a year through various programs including after school, summer school & high school activities. We partner with Upper Room KC, high schools, CAMP WIN and other like organizations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 90% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.5%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 69.5%; rating input score 70
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -14.4%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.67; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.5%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.7% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.5% of revenue deployed · 69.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $49K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.