Stem Education Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 812025111
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Erie, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3034399522
- Rating
- 65
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $48,900
- Expenses
- $36,503
- Assets
- $41,523
- Liabilities
- $13,185
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kathy Collier (Board Member (President))
People named in this filing
- Kathy Collier (Board Member (President))
- Lucy Mwangi (Board Member)
- Matthew Collier (CMO & Volunteer Coordinator)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Inspiring the Next Generation Through STEM-Locally and Globally We are passionate about making STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) exciting, accessible, and impactful. Here in Colorado, we partner with schools and families to offer hands-on STEM experiences for learners from Kindergarten through high school-including creative early learning activities, weekly clubs, and advanced coding and Arduino innovation labs. Internationally, we work closely with schools in underserved communities in Kenya, helping to implement STEM and project-based learning that empowers students and educators alike. We also organize meaningful STEM travel experiences for teachers, students, and volunteers who want to make a difference through educational and humanitarian work in Kenya.
What it reported doing in 2025
CDuring the past year, our work in Kenya continued to grow in both reach and impact, particularly within PP1 and PP2 county schools. One of our greatest accomplishments was gaining meaningful traction with local educators and school leaders who are seeking new ways to improve learning opportunities for children in underserved communities. We conducted multiple teacher trainings focused on Project-Based Learning (PBL), an educational approach recently added to the Kenya government's schemes of work. While the curriculum now emphasizes hands-on and student-centered learning, many teachers have received little or no formal training in how to effectively implement it in their classrooms. Our trainings equipped teachers with practical strategies to make learning more engaging, creative, and relevant to students' daily lives, even in low-resource environments. The response from educators was overwhelmingly positive. Several teachers personally shared that the training had transformed their perspective on education, with some stating they would "never teach the same again" because of what they learned. These moments reinforced the urgent need for continued teacher support and professional development throughout rural Kenya. In addition to our classroom and teacher development efforts, we were invited to meet with the European Union delegation to discuss innovative ways to expand STEM education opportunities in poor and rural regions of Kenya. This meeting represented an important step forward in building partnerships and increasing awareness of the educational challenges facing underserved communities. Traveling to remote areas such as Baringo County further highlighted the seriousness of these challenges. Some schools we visited were holding classes under trees due to a lack of adequate facilities and resources. These firsthand experiences strengthened our commitment to helping children gain access to quality education, STEM learning opportunities, and pathways out of generational poverty. Looking ahead, we believe 2026 has the potential to be a breakthrough year for our work in Kenya. We are preparing grant proposals and strategic partnerships that could significantly expand our programs, improve learning environments, provide additional teacher training, and create sustainable educational opportunities for students in some of the country's most underserved regions. Our long-term goal remains empowering children and communities through education, innovation, and practical STEM learning experiences that help break cycles of poverty and create hope for the future.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 43
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 38.5%; rating input score 38
- Program expense ratio: 51.5%; rating input score 52
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 25.4%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.14; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.32; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 41.1%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -16.2% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.9% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 38.5% of revenue deployed · 51.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $19K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2018 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.