Stem Cell Health Alliance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
680644468
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2009
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2009
Location
Del Mar, CA, USA
Phone
8586996727
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Community Health Systems

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$107,153
Expenses
$100,160
Assets
$14,048

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2009. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2009. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The World Stem Cell Foundation's goal is twofold -- to increase consumer knowledge about stem cell science, and to increase consumer health literacy, which will help patients and their family members to make informed choices about their health care and participation in stem cell therapies and clinical trials. The Foundation partners with credible organizations throughout the United States and around the globe to develop consumer-driven initiatives and collaborative projects, which are based on input gathered from stakeholders, public opinion polls and audience research. A central clearinghouse for stem cell information and a public education campaign with a dedicated Web site, interactive media and disease-specific resources are planned. They will make it easier for patients and family members to access the wide array of stem cell information available and to engage in dialogue about research news, clinical trials, educational events, and treatment options as these are announced.

What it reported doing in 2009

The World Stem Cell Foundation is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the education of patients and other consumers who want current information and answers to their questions about stem cell research, therapies and clinical trials. The Foundation collaborates with partners from public and private organizations that address specific disease and injury conditions through research, clinical trials, new treatment therapies and education.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.5%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.14; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.