The STEM Alliance
Legal name: Stem Alliance of Larchmont- Mamaroneck Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 460973552
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Larchmont, NY, US
- Phone
- 9144191733
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,883,802
- Expenses
- $2,931,772
- Assets
- $1,206,583
- Liabilities
- $676,646
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARGARET KAUFER (PRESIDENT/ CVO)
Highest reported compensation
- MARGARET KAUFER (PRESIDENT/ CVO): $84,044 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The STEM Alliance bridges systemic gaps to provide equal access to critical science, technology, engineering and math learning resources with the goal of empowering communities, inspiring innovation and creating opportunity for all.
What it reported doing in 2024
Digital equity: the stem alliance's digital pathways initiative closes the digital divide by connecting low- and moderate-income residents across westchester county and New York city to computers, internet access, and tech skills training. The stem alliance is a regional leader in digital equity and a trusted partner to state and local governments in administering these programs. The need is acute: among those served, 93% need a device, and 84% of those have no computer in the home at all, while 71% need basic computer training and 64% of those had never received any. This is not a temporary or pandemic-era problem. It is a persistent structural barrier that locks residents out of the basic digital skills that 92% of jobs now require, making full participation in a digitally driven economy impossible without intervention. Since 2020, the initiative has distributed more than 5,200 computing devices, connected over 2,300 households to the internet, and screened more than 5,500 residents for digital need.the results establish a clear pathway from digital access to economic opportunity. Among 3,855 clients surveyed before and after completing the program's 15-hour tech education course, comfort on core workforce platforms such as word, excel, and calendar more than doubled, reaching majority confidence across every platform. Spanish-speaking participants, who entered with the least confidence, made the largest gains and narrowed the gap with their english-speaking peers across most measures. The longer-term impact is direct and lasting: in a follow-up survey of 1,344 clients conducted three to six months after services, 79% or more reported an increased likelihood of using the internet to access healthcare and essential goods and services, 79% reported an increased likelihood of pursuing further training, and 67% reported an increased likelihood of obtaining a better-paying job. In a digitally driven economy, digital inclusion is among the most direct and scalable levers available for workforce development and individual empowerment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.9%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 81.5%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.22 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.7%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.41; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.56; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.9%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 26.6% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 23.5% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.8% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 82.9% of revenue deployed · 81.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $84K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.