Staten Island Soccer Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
813726719
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Staten Island, NY, USA
Phone
5165285717
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$88,684
Expenses
$85,843
Assets
$67,711
Liabilities
$55,925

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Brian Dore (Girls Coordinat)
  • Paul Kadar (Treasurer)
  • Carolyn Scully (Boys Coordinato)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary operational purpose of the Staten Island Soccer Club, Inc. (the Club) is to facilitate a youth soccer travel league in Staten Island for boys and girls. The Club is made up of 9 teams and 131 participants. Our role is to coordinate and set up games, and facilitate rules. Funding for the Club will come from membership dues and funding from local government agencies through grants paying for operational expenses such as referees, fields, and league fees.Total # ofBoys Teams 5Boys 74Total # ofGirls Teams 4Girls 57Total # ofAll Teams 9Players131Team PlayersSISC Arsenal 2009 Boys 17SISC Atletico 2013 Boys 13SISC Freedom 2007 Girls 19SISC Gunners 2006 Boys 19SISC Juventus 2012 Boys 12SISC Lightning 2013 Girls 10SISC Red Bulls 2013 Girls 14SISC Royals 2009 Girls 14SISC Stallions 2014 Boys 13

What it reported doing in 2024

The primary operational purpose of the Staten Island Soccer Club, Inc. (the Club) is to facilitate a youth soccer travel league in Staten Island for boys and girls. The Club is made up of 6 teams and 76 participants. Our role is to coordinate and set up games, and facilitate rules. Funding for the Club will come from membership dues and funding from local government agencies through grants paying for operational expenses such as referees, fields, and league fees.Total # ofBoys Teams 3Boys 39Total # ofGirls Teams 3Girls 37Total # ofAll Teams 6Players 76Team PlayersSISC Atletico 2013 Boys 13SISC Lightning 2013 Girls 10SISC Royals 2009 Girls 14SISC Stallions 2014 Boys 13SISC Fire 2016 Girls 13SISC Inter 2015 Boys 13

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.6%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 89.5%; rating input score 89

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.2%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.79; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.83; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.6% of revenue deployed · 89.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $77K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.