Staten Island Chapter of American Institute of Architects Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133899435
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Staten Island, NY, USA
Phone
7183179600
Rating
51
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$60,732
Expenses
$36,323
Assets
$142,256

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Dominick Casale (Vice President)
  • Thomas J Soviero (President)

People named in this filing

  • Dominick Casale (Vice President)
  • Thomas J Soviero (President)
  • Nell HP Taranto (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To aid in the progress of the profession of architecture in general and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to advance the theory and practice of architecture and its allied fields; to enhance the status of the architect; to increase the usefulness of the organized architectural community and related organizations and in furtherance of such accomplishments to encourage research and the preparation of paper documents and reports on architectural topics; to develop recommended practices and the enlargement of and greater usefulness of architectural libraries; to endeavor to maintain technical and cultural standards for the legal right to practice architecture and to require high standards of ethical practice by members; to foster the study of architecture and encourage the personal and professional development of young architects and students; to cooperate with other architectural societies and groups, and to advance public relations with governmental agencies and the publi

What it reported doing in 2025

Spaghetti/Marshmellow Contest

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 20
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 71
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 16%; rating input score 16
  • Program expense ratio: 26.8%; rating input score 27

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 40.2%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.92; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 16% of revenue deployed · 26.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $10K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 16/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 27/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.