State University College at Brockport Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
222143232
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Brockport, NY, USA
Phone
5853952451
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Undergraduate College (4-year)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,069,603
Expenses
$3,245,950
Assets
$40,158,923
Liabilities
$106,768

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

24 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL ANDRIATCH (BF PRESIDENT)
  • SKYE PAINE (SENATE PRESIDENT)
  • HEIDI MACPHERSON (UNIV PRESIDENT)
  • EDWARD SURIANO (BAA PRESIDENT)
  • TENIN SIDIME (BSG PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • MICHAEL ANDRIATCH (BF PRESIDENT): $265,150 total reported compensation
  • CHRIS SMITH (AVP, DIVISION OF ADVANCEMENT): $161,999 total reported compensation
  • ADAM STANDISH (DIRECTOR OF GIVING): $155,494 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the state university college at brockport foundation, inc. Is to build a culture of philanthropy and engagement.since 1976, the brockport foundation has partnered with the college atbrockport to foster a culture of philanthropy that honors and supportsour mission of student success. The foundation, in collaboration withthe division of advancement, oversees the investment and financialmanagement of all gifts to the college. This group of committedvolunteers dedicates its time, talent, and treasure to help ensure thatsustainable funding for scholarships, academic and facilityenhancements, and special events is available so that we may continueto provide our students with a transformational educational experience.

What it reported doing in 2024

Provide funds to support and enrich the quality of academic programsand campus life including 611 scholarships, 27 summer research awards, and 113 student travel awards.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 42% for direct work, 56% for grants, and 2% for affiliated organizations.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 89
  • Sustainability: 86
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70.3%; rating input score 70
  • Program expense ratio: 88.2%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.82 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 36%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 12.37; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 70.3% of revenue deployed · 88.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 18 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $265K · 24 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 30/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.