State of Hope Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 813441004
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Port Matilda, PA, USA
- Phone
- 8144049524
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $75,206
- Expenses
- $53,510
- Assets
- $91,025
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEPHAN NATHAN STUPAR (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- MARISSA ANN STUPAR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- JOSEPH P GAZZA (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- STEPHAN NATHAN STUPAR (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- MARISSA ANN STUPAR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- JOSEPH P GAZZA (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The state of hope foundation has set out to provide disadvantaged children with positive life experiences that enrich lives, build confidence and instill hope.
What it reported doing in 2024
Target christmas shopping spree takes local foster children & families experiencing hard financial times on a christmas shopping spree at target. Each child recieves a budget to shop for gifts for themselves & families, accompanied by volunteers and community supporters.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 38
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 33.4%; rating input score 33
- Program expense ratio: 47%; rating input score 47
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 28.8%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.7; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 28%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 33.4% of revenue deployed · 47% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $25K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 33/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.