State Line Abortion Access Partners

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
931554501
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Bristol, VA, USA
Phone
9174472362
Rating
93
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Reproductive Rights

Reported finances

Revenue
$51,640
Expenses
$48,669
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KIMBERLY SMITH (BOARD PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KIMBERLY SMITH (BOARD PRESIDENT)
  • KRIS WEATHERFORD (BOARD SECRETARY)
  • BARBARA SCHWARTZ (BOARD TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of State Line Abortion Access Partners shall be to promote and protect abortion access and reproductive health care for individuals in Southwest Virginia and anyone who travels to the region for abortion care. This includes advocating for policies that ensure access to medication and surgical abortion; tracking and

What it reported doing in 2024

In2024, SLAAP shielded over 1000 patients seeking care at abortion clinics, created and distributed 1900 patient care bagsdistributed over 5,000 menstrual supplies through our PositivePeriodProject, distributed over 6000 condoms and 800un of emergency contraception through our Be Prepared Program

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 95
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93.4%; rating input score 93
  • Program expense ratio: 99.1%; rating input score 99

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.8%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 124.1% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 60.4% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 93.4% of revenue deployed · 99.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $48K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.