State Beauty Culturist Association of New York Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
824137302
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
6468940464
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Reported finances

Revenue
$9,076
Expenses
$11,955
Assets
$4,130
Liabilities
$7,009

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAMES C DAVIS (President)

People named in this filing

  • JAMES C DAVIS (President)
  • HAZEL STOKES (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The State Beauty Culture Association of New York, Inc is the oldest professional organization in the state of New York. The main objective of the State Beauty Culturist Association is: Give back to our personal and professional community.Help in licensure of all salon professional.Increase the membership throughout Local, State and National levels.Empower the minds of all Cosmetologists, and Professional Beauty Care Professional through education.Provide an annual Scholarship to academic or vocational students for their higher learning.

What it reported doing in 2018

The State Beauty Culture Association of New York, Inc. is the oldest professional organization in the state of New York. The main objective of the State Beauty Culturist Association is: Gie back to our personal and professional communities.Help in licensure of all salon professional.Increase the membership throughout Local, State and National levels.Empower the minds of all Cosmetologists, and Professional Beauty care Professional through education.Continuing educator for all Cosmetologists.Provide an annual Scholorship to academic or vocational student for their higher learning.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -31.7%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.7; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $12K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.