State Bar of New Mexico

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
850242641
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Albuquerque, NM, USA
Phone
5057976000
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,205,627
Expenses
$4,040,403
Assets
$9,326,023
Liabilities
$6,873,341

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

27 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ERINNA ATKINS (PRESIDENT)
  • AJA BROOKS (PRESIDENT- E)

Highest reported compensation

  • RICHARD SPINELLO (EXECUTIVE DI): $184,244 total reported compensation
  • STORMY RALSTIN (GENERAL COUN): $166,150 total reported compensation
  • DAVID R POWELL (DIRECTOR OF): $149,770 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the state bar of New Mexico is to be a united and inclusive organization serving the legal profession and the public.

What it reported doing in 2024

Office of general counsel and regulatory programs the office of general counsel is a professional office that assists the state bar and the foundation with policy and regulatory functions of an integrated bar. Specifically, its functions are to protect the legal and policy interests of the state bar; assist in governance and regulatory functions; provide a professional legal resource for leadership, volunteers, and staff; assist with outreach to the judiciary; and advise in the areas of legislative, executive, and judicial processes. In addition, the office of general counsel oversees the administration of the access to justice fund (atj) and the client protection fund (cpf). The state bar's atj fund grant commission is the financial steward of the New Mexico supreme court fund for the atj fund, for which the state bar is the fiscal agent. The atj fund consists of funds generated pursuant to supreme court rule, including interest on lawyer's trust accounts (iolta) and pro hac vice fees, as well as donations. The atj fund provides grants to qualified civil legal service providers selected by the atj fund grant commission. The state bar is also the iolta program administrator for New Mexico. An iolta account is a pooled, interest-bearing demand deposit account used by lawyers to hold client funds. The current rules require that all New Mexico attorneys who hold eligible funds to participate in iolta and that the funds be held at eligible financial institutions. The interest generated by the client funds held in a pooled, interest-bearing trust account are remitted to the state bar, which holds the funds in the atj fund and distributes them at the discretion of the New Mexico supreme court and the atj fund grant commission. The commission on client protection is a statewide body whose purpose is to promote public confidence in the administration of justice and the integrity of the legal profession by reimbursing losses caused by the dishonest conduct of lawyers admitted and licensed to practice law in the courts of New Mexico. The funds in the client protection fund are used for reimbursing these losses. The office of general counsel and regulatory programs also oversees the licensing of New Mexico admitted attorneys and nonadmitted attorneys wishing to appear before a New Mexico court in a civil matter, who are charged pro hac vice filing fees.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 87% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 66
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73.2%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 76.1%; rating input score 76
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.9%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.31; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.74; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 15.6%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73.2% of revenue deployed · 76.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 22 of 22 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $3.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $184K · 27 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $103K reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 16 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 13 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.