Startup Game Changer

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
932850811
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Cerritos, CA, USA
Phone
7145047434
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Small Business Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,474
Expenses
$6,087
Assets
$7,887
Liabilities
$8,500

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Anshuman Sinha (Director)
  • Ashish Saboo (Director)
  • Shankar Ram (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our primary exempt purpose is to provide free and affordable program services to startup founders and entrepreneurs who would otherwise face high consultancy fees. We aim to support their journey by offering resources, networking opportunities, and mentorship to help them succeed.

What it reported doing in 2024

Startup Game Changer Summit: Activities Conducted: A summit for startup founders and investors.Participants: Startup founders, entrepreneurs, angel investors, venture capital firms, and service providers.Location: Various cities in Southern California, including Garden Grove, Cerritos, and Tustin.Frequency: Quarterly event.Fees: Admission fees range from $20 to $50, depending on the participant's role.Time and Resources: Accounts for 40% of the organization's time each quarter.Furthering Exempt Purposes: This summit empowers entrepreneurs by providing a platform for networking, education, and access to potential investors, fostering business growth and innovation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -11.2%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.3; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.08; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.