Stardom Up Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
463700805
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Miami, FL, USA
Phone
3053229091
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Reported finances

Expenses
$2,726
Assets
$1,239

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • LUIS F MARTINEZ (DIRECTOR/CUR)
  • MICHAEL ALBERT (BOARD MEMBER)
  • ADRIENNE CELAYA (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Stardom up is a non-profit corporation and shall operate exclusively for educational and charitable purposes within the meaning of section 501 (c) (3) of the internal revenue code, or the corresponding section of any future federal tax code. Stardom up's purpose is to spark and maintain engagement for any young student in their community's technology ecosystem. We do that through unique, free introductions to tech entrepreneurship, providing opportunities for further development and connections to an array of options within their ecosystem. The stardom up online engagement platform is free of charge and facilitates students' continuous engagement through courses and events that build individual technology profiles. To maximize our impact on current efforts, we may seek to collaborate with other non-profit organizations which fall under the 501(c) (3) section of the internal revenue code and are operated exclusively for educational and charitable purposes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 17
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.45; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -49% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -70.6% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -54.4% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 3 of 3 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.