Starc of Louisiana Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
720727074
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Slidell, LA, USA
Phone
9856410197
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$9,893,230
Expenses
$9,609,878
Assets
$13,251,423
Liabilities
$4,027,738

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

21 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARK BAHAM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • KAY TAYLOR (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • Chris Kaufmann (President)
  • Donna Bach (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARK BAHAM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $190,519 total reported compensation
  • SUZANNE H BOURGEOIS (DIR. OF OPERATONS): $127,252 total reported compensation
  • SUSAN D BAHAM (CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER): $123,986 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Stark's mission is to provide a lifetime of services, training, advocacy, resources, and conmmunity connections for individuals with intellectual and/or developmentsal disabilities to help them reash their potential as independent, contributing members of their communities in st. Tammany parish and surrounding parishes.

What it reported doing in 2024

Infant habilitation services - provides services to families with infants and toddlers from birth to 36 months of age who have a medical condition likely to result in a cognitive, motor, vision, hearing, communication, social-emotional, and/or adaptive developmental delay(s), or who have already been diagnosed with one or more developmental delays. Early steps services are designed to improve a family's capacity to enhance a child's development. These services are provided in the child's natural environment, such as the child's home, childcare, or any other community setting typical for children from birth to 36 months of age.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 70% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 77
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.4%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 80.3%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: $27.72 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.9%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.38; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.3; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.7%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78.4% of revenue deployed · 80.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $7.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $191K · 21 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $170K reported
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 9 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.