Starbase Minnesota Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411756817
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- St Paul, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6127132530
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Elementary, Secondary Education, K - 12
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,024,291
- Expenses
- $2,878,597
- Assets
- $1,662,291
- Liabilities
- $18,328
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BELINDA CORDINA (PRESIDENT/CH)
Highest reported compensation
- MELANIE PETERS (EXECUTIVE DI): $128,154 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To inspire and educate Minnesota youth in science, technology, engineering and math (stem)
What it reported doing in 2024
Starbase Minnesota, inc. Is a dedicated stem education non-profit, partnering with the department of defense, Minnesota air national guard, corporations, and community organizations. Their central aim is to ignite curiosity and empower youth in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and math (stem). The cornerstone of their efforts is the dod starbase program-a 20-25 hour immersive onsite stem experience. Students step into the vibrant, technology-rich environments at the Minnesota air national guard bases: the 133rd airlift wing in st. Paul and the 148th fighter wing in duluth. Here, learning unfolds in ways that are both exciting and hands-on.alongside onsite programs, starbase continued to expand its reach throughout Minnesota. Through its stem kit initiative, the organization provided stem kits and curriculum to more than 31,000 5th grade students and their teachers in 392 schools across the state in fy25. In st. Paul and duluth, starbase served a combined total of 6,698 students through five-day school year and summer onsite programs. Meanwhile, the starbase destination mars stem kits extended learning to an additional 35,000 students and their educators across Minnesota.the impact of starbase programs is evident in the outcomes. Among students, 93% demonstrated improved stem knowledge and skills, with a remarkable 32 percentage point gain from pre- to post-test. 95% reported that starbase made learning fun, 99% discovered new things, and 90% felt an increased interest in stem fields. Most expressed a desire to pursue a stem career.in duluth, 94% of students increased their stem knowledge and skills, achieving a 21.5% average improvement from pre- to post-test. 97% found the program enjoyable, 75% reported greater interest in stem, and the majority indicated an interest in stem careers.teachers, too, experienced significant benefits. Between 92-99% reported gains in stem knowledge and teaching strategies, 99-100% rated the starbase programs as excellent or very good, and 100% expressed a desire to return.beyond students and teachers, starbase also engaged a combined total of 421 educators who participated in onsite programs for 6,875 hours. The programs further benefited from the contributions of 989 military, corporate, and community volunteers, who together donated over 5,184 hours to starbase efforts.the story of starbase Minnesota, inc. Is one of collaboration, innovation, and measurable impact-a tale of inspiring the next generation of stem leaders across the state.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 87% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.8%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 94.3%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: $388.07 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.8%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.5%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.8% of revenue deployed · 94.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 22 of 22 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $128K · 23 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.