Star View Children and Family Services
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 943238299
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Long Beach, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3102216336
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Residential Care & Adult Day Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $18,962,641
- Expenses
- $18,351,489
- Assets
- $9,608,889
- Liabilities
- $1,896,267
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kent Dunlap (Interim Executive Director)
- MARK KIMBALL (President)
Highest reported compensation
- SHAVON DRAPER (NURSING DIRECTOR): $186,572 total reported compensation
- STEPHON D CANNON (FACILITIES MANAGER): $146,591 total reported compensation
- ERIN LINN (MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAM DIRECTOR): $139,671 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Starview children & family services provides social and mental health services in California. The services provided will embody a commitment to high clinical standards and quality improvements to assist clients to achieve their maximum potential quality of life.
What it reported doing in 2024
Family Preservation: The Family Preservation Program (FPP)'s emphasis is on children and strengthening their relationship with their families. It is a short-term, strength-based, and community-centered program that aims to ensure children are adequately protected and free from abuse, exploitation, and neglect. Beyond that, FPP hopes to bring permanency to children through means of reunification, adoption, or guardianship, at a time that is most safe and comfortable for them. We create a secure, nurturing environment with services that specifically enhance and promote the physical, emotional, mental, cultural, social, and educational development of the child. Services We Provide: Individual, family, and group counseling, Parenting training, Substitute adult role modeling, Child-focused activities, Therapeutic day treatment, In-home outreach visits, In-home emergency caretaker, Self-help family support groups, Teaching and demonstrating homemaking services, Resource and referrals & Transportation. Wrap Starlight: The County's Wraparound program (the program) is funded through both the Short-Doyle/Medi-Cal (SD/MC) program, as well as through Wraparound funds received from the State and administered by the County's Social Services Agency (SSA). The CONTRACTOR shall implement the program in accordance with all laws and regulations governing Medi-Cal and Medicaid programs imposed by federal, state, and local statutes, regulations, including but not limited to California Code of Regulations (CCR) Titles 9 and 22. Service Intent and Goals: To treat and ameliorate the mental health symptoms and maladaptive behavior of clients, and their families in the least restrictive and least intrusive manner. To provide outpatient mental health services within the context of the client's family, culture, language, and community, according to developmental age-appropriate needs. To deliver outpatient mental health services in the clinic, home, school, and community, as appropriate to the treatment needs and service goals of the client and family. To promote coordination and collaboration in care planning efforts with other child-serving agencies and institutions involved in delivering services to the client and family to ensure comprehensive and consistent care. To direct service objectives towards achieving the client, family, and system desired results as identified in the Mental Health Service Plan. To provide comprehensive culturally relevant outpatient mental health services to treat clients, families, and/or groups experiencing acute and/or ongoing psychological distress affecting their relationships and ability to function in their environments; and to provide culturally proficient services. Unduplicated clients served during the year 83 with FY Goal 140. Wraparound Services 83 with FY Goal 145.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 78% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.8%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 90.8%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.2%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.52; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.2%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.8% of revenue deployed · 90.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $16.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $187K · 14 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $2.4M reported
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.